Oceanic and continental plate comparison |
In straightforward language, the key differences between the continental and oceanic types of tectonic plates boil down to three points: composition, thickness, and age. Bennett actually managed to cover these points... but he did a lousy job, leaving his post splattered with inaccuracies and misinformation. Here are a few of his more bogus statements:
- "Earth’s surface is divided into approximately a dozen rigid pieces, comprised of eight major and several minor plates."
- "Oceanic plates are formed by divergent plate boundaries. These zones [are] where the new oceanic crust is being created. As lava flows from these volcanic ridges, it quickly cools, forming extrusive igneous rock."
- "Oceanic plates are mafic in nature, comprised of basalt rock."
- "...continental rock is primarily comprised of aluminum and sodium, plus the minerals feldspar and quartz."
- Some geologists say seven, not eight, and there are "many" minor plates.
- Oceanic crust isn't made by lava, nor is it mostly basalt: it's mostly a complex of sheeted dikes injected into the rift zone with the occasional gabbro pluton included.
- See previous point (not to mention that "basalt rock" is redundant, Doug).
- No, continental crust is relatively rich in aluminum and sodium, though far richer in silicon. Neither aluminum nor sodium is abundant in its native form – in fact, it's almost impossible to have native sodium at STP.
copyright © 2018-2023 scmrak
SI - TECTONICS
No comments:
Post a Comment