Calcite rhombohedron on clear, prismatic quartz crystals |
Unlike many of our DotD nominees, Zinni didn't completely blow her eHow.com assignment. Oh, sure, she said some stupid and/or erroneous stuff, but much of what she wrote was technically correct, although apparently aimed at about a third-grade level. Take, for instance, her comparison of the chemistry of the two minerals:
"Calcite is made of calcium carbonate, a compound containing calcium, carbon and oxygen atoms. Quartz is silicon dioxide, a chemical compound with one atom of silicon and two atoms of oxygen."
"Quartz is much harder than calcite. Quartz reaches 7 on the Mohs scale of mineral hardness, whereas calcite's hardness is 3..."Which, except for that nonspecific "much," is technically correct, but shouldn't Zinni have mentioned that the two minerals are defined as 7 and 3 on the Mohs scale? Sure, she should have... There are other missteps as well:
- "Quartz is not associated with living creatures...": You forgot radiolarians and diatoms, Yasmin.
- "...quartz is more common as a component of igneous rocks, such as granite and basalt...": Quartz is actually fairly rare in basalt; in fact many basalts have no quartz at all.
- "...calcite and quartz are both found in hexagonal and pyramidal forms...": technically speaking, both are trigonal, not hexagonal; but the upshot is that the shape of a random crystal isn't diagnostic.
- Yasmin should have mentioned cleavage in calcite vs. conchoidal fracture in quartz... but didn't...
copyright © 2018-2021 scmrak
SI - MINERALS
No comments:
Post a Comment