Geometry compass |
McDaniel opened with the monumentally uninformative statement,
"Measuring elevation requires a series of complicated measurements."Sounds like someone didn't take any science courses on the way to that BA in Chinese literature! And that assessment is borne out by the rest of Byrd's post, in doofus statements like,
"Most scientists today measure the elevation of mountains by placing radios on the peaks of a mountain range, after which, satellites take measurements and determine the elevation."Sure, but what does that "satellite" measure, anyway? Could it be, oh, we dunno, travel time for radio signals? And then there's, "Use a geometry compass to determine the angle from the ground to the top of the object, your point of interest."WTF is a "geometry compass," anyway? Does McDaniel mean a protractor? a clinometer? a transit? Byrd finishes up by telling his readers to, |
"Plug your numbers into the equation: tangent x = b/a... Solve the equation for "b", by multiplying "a" by the tangent of your angle."Ummm, we're pretty sure that's not a particularly accurate method of determining the elevation of a mountain peak, which is what McDaniel thinks we're doing: a slight error in measuring the angle could have a heckuva big influence on the result... Oh, and Byrd? John? Whoever? that's not exactly what we'd call "taking precise measurements of slopes and angles."
What a moron... but what a fine Dumbass of the Day McDaniel makes!
copyright © 2018-2022 scmrak
SI - SURVEYING
No comments:
Post a Comment