headlight beam pattern comparison |
Broeker managed to get the core purpose of fog lights onto the page:
"They... help you see through the fog."
We mean, really: who doesn't know that? It's the rest of the 350-plus words that contained the stench of ignorance. Here's a partial list of some of the more egregious dumbassery Broeker submitted:
- "...fog lights [are] man-made illumination located on your car's light switch." – No Heather, they're located on the front end of the car.
- "They are low beams that help you see through the fog." – No, Heather, they are low-mounted lights designed to illuminate the road surface below a layer of fog.
- "If you were to use your regular or high-beam lights..." – That reads like Heather thinks that low beams are "regular" lights... or maybe that high beams are "regular" – it's ambiguous.
- "Fog lights... only light the ground immediately in front of your car..." – Depends on your definition of "immediately," we guess, but most project out at least 100 feet.
- "...the light they expel is actually cut off at the top, creating a light pattern that projects straight out, then flat and then down, but not higher." – First, WTF is this "expel" bullshit? Was that Heather's attempted synonym for "project"? And second, how the heck do you change the direction of a beam of light without a reflecting or refracting surface? Hint: you can't...
Broeker also seems to have missed the information that the beam of fog lights covers a shorter and wider area than conventional headlight low- or high-beams. Guess she should have looked harder.
Given the combination of clueless verbiage and half-assed research, is it any wonder that we decided to award Broeker another Dumbass of the Day award?
SE - AUTOMOTIVE
No comments:
Post a Comment