Solve this equation, Oliver... |
We have people on staff who aren't afraid to tackle a math problem. We asked one of them how you might describe the process of solving an equation, and she hemmed and hawed for a couple of minutes before allowing that, without seeing the equation in question, you can't write a "how-to" for this topic. She did, however, mention a few words she figured would probably show up somewhere in most such answers, including
- substitute
- reduce
- simplify
Of course, Oliver's little how-to includes none of these three. In fact, VanderVoort states right up front that
"This article will not give you the skeleton key to solving problems..."
...well, duh, of course not: there is none! But there are techniques Oliver never mentions that would help! VanDervoort does little beyond referring his readers to a couple of websites such as one that he says
"...will not tell you how to solve the problem so much in that [it] will actually give you the answer so you don't need to figure out the solution..." |
Riddle us this: VanDervoort really had the unmitigated gall to title this piece of crap "How to Solve Math Equations"? Even though there is not a single word about solving an equation, and the only example the dumbass supplies is "2+2"; which isn't even an equation, come to think of it!
Small wonder that our research staff recognized a mother lode of dumbassery in Oliver's "work." We predict that VanDervoort is a name you can expect to see again, perhaps even rising to the level of a Whetzel or a Manal. Whatever the case, this is Oliver's second Dumbass of the Day award during Catalogs.com week – but we suspect it won't be his last! |
copyright © 2016-2023 scmrak
MM - ALGEBRA
No comments:
Post a Comment