Geophysical exploration for gems |
Milton's post seems to be little more than thinly disguised click bait, although the term probably wasn't in use back in 2009 when he originally published this dreck. It seems John wanted people to visit a website named "glittering stones," which sold – you guessed it – "precious stones." If you wander through Archive.org long enough, you'll learn that the business (which also sold men's suits and kitchen cabinets at one time) was located somewhere near Birmingham, Alabama.
But that's neither here nor there: the reason we singled out Milton today is because of utter rubbish such as these statements:
|
At first, we weren't sure where Milton came up with the crap about "diamond-bearing Kimberli"; but by the time we had slogged through the load of bushwa John M. published in that article, we had figured out where he stole it. That last line – "not typically obtainable with many geophysical utensils" – was so obviously spun that we just started a Google search with the terms
resolution not typically obtainable with geophysical tools gemstones
By golly, we found Milton's original source: a Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysics article entitled Geophysical Methods Used in Exploration for Gemstones. Yep, it's all there in Frederick Cook's introduction – spun to within an inch of its life by some money-hungry dumbass who didn't know enough about the topic to know that "geophysical utensils" is so stupid it gave him away. |
And that, dear readers, is why sparkly rock salesman John Milton is the not-so-proud recipient of our Dumbass of the Day award for today.
copyright © 2017-2023 scmrak
SI - MINERALS
No comments:
Post a Comment