A Forstner bit in a drill press |
The dead giveaway that Tested is full of malarkey is his short description, in which he claimed that
"A forstner bit is the best woodworking tool to use for pocket and overlap holes. "Ummm, no: those aren't "pocket holes," dude: a pocket hole drill bit is an entirely different tool! Meanwhile, Tested claimed to have shelled out somewhere in the area of $570 for four sets of bits (ranging from $35 to $370 at Amazon) and one single bit. He also claimed to have tested all of them, informing readers that he had
"...tested the bits on both soft and hard woods..."...along with other throwaway verbiage such as
"...though the wood wasn't the softest I could have used, the bits delivered the kind of result needed in a professional environment..."Interestingly enough, Tested pretended to have tested a 16-piece, $370 set of bits from Freud, a subset of which are in the AN woodshop. You would think that in reviewing them he might have mentioned that these particular bits are HSS (high-speed steel) as opposed to, say, carbide-tipped – but no. Still, he claims that they're "the right choice for the professional woodworker." Ya gotta wonder about that...
Of a set of CMT metric bits, Tested claims that
"Metric sizes can be a bit hard to find and the set covers the five most common sizes."The latter is true (though TtD doesn't bother to mention that the set ranges from 15 to 35mm); the former not so much. What's amusing is that he also "tested" a single bit, the CMT 537.350.31, that just happens to be the largest size bit in this set... So much for harvesting the five top-selling Forstner bits from the Amazon listings: at least check for duplicates, dumbass!
¹ The late Harriet Klausner was probably the most prolific book reviewer ever at Amazon, posting scores of reviews per day – most of which were just reworded blurbs from the covers. No one ever knew why... Her prolific reviewing did, however, earn her a Wikipedia entry.
copyright © 2017-2022 scmrak
DD - POWER TOOLS
No comments:
Post a Comment